TIME

7/7/12

Have blogged concerning local farmer and possible connection[s] that encourage and allow abuse and robbery  of worker[s] related to permission from authority; found story/confirmation about local person that am helping a local market in which one of the persons connections are such that they are familar [have had dealings]with the communication system concerning the robbery/economic; etc. of African Americans. [especially concerning negotiating a settlement];Today at local market=males of the larger society=had Black couple in royal blue outfits to approach Swi-zer stand; while white couple [female pregnant] stood in front of the stand I was at; then had African American male and female to avoid coming infront of stand that I was at=suppose to be symbolic of giving Switzer relationship that guy who wants to date me [like Duke][royal blue color] from African American community [which romantic relationship that is good is not allowed in black community][in exchange for living in white community with a bastard child]; Word to the Wise =God sent me here as an African American=please back off=bastards have kept and held my life for over thirty years=stopo;
book Kacking Work by Bill Jensen and Hosh Klein=explain the system of how they have been using my gift and talents to hack their system; then reap the benefits and if I don't then I don't live=tired=STOP bother me=ask local librarian at 5th Street library fat and black a question=she called secrutity=they changed it so person cannot have a reservation  and use another computer til time.
Socialpeacest



The story/Confirmation of connections:  is as follows and one of the individuals was accused of misdealings through established system:



BY MICHAEL H.

WINSTON-SALEM -- In 1997, Forsyth County farmer Vern Swi-zer was part of a class-action lawsuit a group of black farmers filed against the federal government, alleging years of racial discrimination.
The farmers successfully negotiated a settlement, but some still haven't seen any money. That may change after a federal judge's final approval of a second settlement worth $1.25 billion.
But Swi-zer said last week he's not sure if he or other black farmers will ever see a dime.


"They keep passing resolutions and I haven't heard anything," he said. "I don't know if this is a smokescreen or what."




Black farmers filed a lawsuit against Dan Glic-man, then the U.S. secretary of agriculture, in 1997. The original plaintiff in the lawsuit was North Carolina farmer Timothy Pig-ord before the lawsuit became a class-action suit.


The lawsuit said from 1983 to 1997, the U.S. Department of Agriculture denied black farmers loans and other benefits and failed to investigate claims of racial discrimination, violating federal civil rights laws.
The farmers alleged the Agriculture Department had a history of racial discrimination spanning nearly 20

U.S. District Judge Paul Frie-man approved a first settlement in 1999, but some farmers didn't get money because they didn't file their claims in time. In February 2010, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack announced a $1.25 billion settlement. Congress included $100 million in a 2008 farm bill and appropriated an additional $1.15 billion in November 2010.
Frie-man gave final approval of the $1.25 billion settlement Oct. 27. The settlement will affect about 40,000 black farmers.
Switzer said some farmers in the first settlement received $50,000 to $100,000. That's not a lot of money considering many of those farmers have millions of dollars of debt, he said.
"A lot of people are $1 million in debt, so $50,000 isn't even a drop in the bucket," Swi-zer said.
Some black farmers spoke out against the proposed deal during a hearing in September. Thomas Bur-ell, president of the Black Farmers and Agriculturalists Inc. in Memphis, Tenn., said he plans to appeal the ruling on due process and equal protection grounds, according to The Commercial Appeal newspaper.
Switzer said this country was built off the backs of black slaves.
"Mostly every farmer in this country benefited from the black farmer that was brought from Africa," he said.
Swi-zer said he hopes black farmers will be compensated for years of racial discrimination, but he isn't concerned about the money because he loves farming.
"I was born a farmer and I'll die a farmer," he said.
***********************

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2902728/posts
http://www.allischalmers.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53131&title=ethics-complaint-eric-h-holder-jr

The Ethics Complaint begins:

July 2, 2012
Office of Bar Counsel
re: Ethics complaint against member Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Dear board members,
This letter serves as notice that a complaint is being filed against one of your members for professionalmisconduct. A search of your website at http://www.dcbar.org/ shows Eric H. Holder, Jr., currentlyAttorney General of the United States, has been an active DC Bar member since he was admitted on January 23, 1980.
As per your professional standards published as Rule 8.4, “Misconduct,” at link, “It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:

• (a) Violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;
• (b) Commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as alawyer in other respects;
• (c) Engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation;
• (d) Engage in conduct that seriously interferes with the administration of justice;
• (e) State or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official;
• (f) Knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law; or
• (g) Seek or threaten to seek criminal charges or disciplinary charges solely to obtain an advantage in acivil matter.

”It would appear that several, if not all of these rules, have been violated as evidenced by Eric Holder having been found in contempt of Congress on June 28, 2012 “for refusal to comply with a subpoena dulyissued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform” (Note House Calendar No. 140/Report112-546 appearing at: link).
“While District of Columbia courts have not (yet) been involved, there is no question that the Congress has found the Attorney General guilty of contempt under conditions that rise to your definition of ‘serious crime’,” the letter reminds the board. “It would also appear that Attorney General Holder is required to report the contempt finding to you within the ten day requirement, and that the Bar ‘shall’ investigate this matter.”

Holder Bar Complaint (full doc)