Proof -All people to prison/msnbc Loretta Weinberg (D) Rachael Maddow
2/11/14
Every Friday evening when Rachel Maddow closed her news talk show; she says, "NOW, I'M SENDING YOU TO PRISON!"; thought only judges in the United States Court system could send people to prison; Every Friday when Rachel Maddow says, "NOW, I'M SENDING YOU TO PRISON!"; she means that is exactly what she is doing; which means that Rachel Maddow has an understanding that all roads lead to the white males global system of "prison"; and at the same time if any of the legal officials were doing their job; Rachael Maddow wouldnot be saying "NOW, I'M SENDING YOU TO PRISON!" unless of coarse she means the men who are operating the "school to prison pipeline" along with the numerous others as well as the new pipeline to prison systems that are being created;
Rachel Maddow
[http://www.businessinsider.com/rachel-maddow-theory-christie-bridge-scandal-weinberg-2014-1];
PROOF: The words on the screen behind Rachael Maddow confirm Rachael Maddow is aware of her words;"The Ramifications...they should have thought about before opering thier mouths" and if not she should be;
And even if "NOW, I'M SENDING YOU TO PRISON!"]is what the news castor Rachel Maddowis joking when she says[NOW, I'M SENDING YOU TO PRISON!"]; still only a judge in the United States Courts are allowed to say and mean "NOW, I'M SENDING YOU TO PRISON!"; being that the fact the Rachael Maddow makes the statement , "NOW, I'M SENDING YOU TO PRISON!" as if she means it- confirms a theory that was blogged about apprx.2008 [in which the theory was made before the public made the acknowledgement of the "schools to prison pipeline" [apprx. 2011] that prison systems were being designed to force/intimidate innocent people into prisons, so that white males could use innoncent people to make money; along with the fact that Rachel Maddow uses Theories in her news episodes to
"Rachel Maddow Has A Totally Different Theory About Chris Christie's Bridge Scandal";Brett LoGiurato;
Jan. 10, 2014, 9:24 AM;[http://www.businessinsider.com/rachel-maddow-theory-christie-bridge-scandal-weinberg-2014-1];
give possible insights into misbehavior of those who work in/for the public or have attention from those in the media who report on others behaviors; when Rachel Maddow says, "NOW, I'M SENDING YOU TO PRISON!"; she could be talking about the name of the show that comes on after her ["LOCKUP"][documentary about what people in the prison system have to go through]-
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/27118605/ns/msnbc-documentaries/];
Every Friday evening when Rachel Maddow closed her news talk show; she says, "NOW, I'M SENDING YOU TO PRISON!"; thought only judges in the United States Court system could send people to prison; Every Friday when Rachel Maddow says, "NOW, I'M SENDING YOU TO PRISON!"; she means that is exactly what she is doing; which means that Rachel Maddow has an understanding that all roads lead to the white males global system of "prison"; and at the same time if any of the legal officials were doing their job; Rachael Maddow wouldnot be saying "NOW, I'M SENDING YOU TO PRISON!" unless of coarse she means the men who are operating the "school to prison pipeline" along with the numerous others as well as the new pipeline to prison systems that are being created;
[http://www.businessinsider.com/rachel-maddow-theory-christie-bridge-scandal-weinberg-2014-1];
PROOF: The words on the screen behind Rachael Maddow confirm Rachael Maddow is aware of her words;"The Ramifications...they should have thought about before opering thier mouths" and if not she should be;
And even if "NOW, I'M SENDING YOU TO PRISON!"]is what the news castor Rachel Maddowis joking when she says[NOW, I'M SENDING YOU TO PRISON!"]; still only a judge in the United States Courts are allowed to say and mean "NOW, I'M SENDING YOU TO PRISON!"; being that the fact the Rachael Maddow makes the statement , "NOW, I'M SENDING YOU TO PRISON!" as if she means it- confirms a theory that was blogged about apprx.2008 [in which the theory was made before the public made the acknowledgement of the "schools to prison pipeline" [apprx. 2011] that prison systems were being designed to force/intimidate innocent people into prisons, so that white males could use innoncent people to make money; along with the fact that Rachel Maddow uses Theories in her news episodes to
"Rachel Maddow Has A Totally Different Theory About Chris Christie's Bridge Scandal";Brett LoGiurato;
Jan. 10, 2014, 9:24 AM;[http://www.businessinsider.com/rachel-maddow-theory-christie-bridge-scandal-weinberg-2014-1];
give possible insights into misbehavior of those who work in/for the public or have attention from those in the media who report on others behaviors; when Rachel Maddow says, "NOW, I'M SENDING YOU TO PRISON!"; she could be talking about the name of the show that comes on after her ["LOCKUP"][documentary about what people in the prison system have to go through]-
Maybe Rachel Maddow is helping to direct weak minded/innocent people to prison when she says[NOW, I'M SENDING YOU TO PRISON!"];and a lot of people would ignore what was being said; but if what Dr. OZ said is true; that hearing certain words have a specific effect on a person[s] mindset; my question is Rachel Maddow helping to send people to prison through her speaking of the phrase,"NOW, I'M SENDING YOU TO PRISON!", even if it is ;unknowingly; still only a judge is suppose to say and mean ,"NOW, I'M SENDING YOU TO PRISON!"]and anybody who has ever seen one of the programs where Rachael Maddow is in full action; knows that all the words spoken by Rachael Maddow have serious meaning and Rachael Maddow usually means what she says;
Deanna
******
"Rachel Maddow Has A Totally Different Theory About Chris Christie's Bridge Scandal";Brett LoGiurato;
Jan. 10, 2014, 9:24 AM
MSNBC host Rachel Maddow on Thursday speculated on a new reason the administration of Gov. Chris Christie would want to close lanes onto the George Washington Bridge from Fort Lee.
Her theory is that the Christie administration targeted Sen. Loretta Weinberg (D), the state Senate Democratic leader, for political retribution — not, as has been alleged, the mayor of Fort Lee.
Here's the gist of her theory:
There's no evidence in any of 20-plus pages of documents leaked so far of anything linked to Weinberg. There are four people whose emails and text messages are detailed in the documents — Kelly, Wildstein, Bill Stepien (Christie's former campaign manager), and Bill Baroni (the former deputy executive director of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and Christie's top official at the Port Authority) — and they do not mention her.
Moreover, they often mention Fort Lee Mayor Mark Sokolich, a Democrat who did not endorse Christie for re-election last year — unlike many other Democratic municipal officials. And they refer to him in very negative, personal terms.
Baroni frequently referred to Sokolich as "the Serbian." When an early Wall Street Journal story came out about the lane closures, Stepien called Sokolich an "idiot." Wildstein responded that it was going to be a "tough November for this little Serbian." (Sokolich is actually Croatian, he told CNN.)
And Kelly thanked Wildstein for ignoring Sokolich's complaints about the traffic. On Sept. 9, Sokolich reached out to Baroni's office. Baroni got an email with the subject: "Phone call: Mayor Sokolich ... urgent matter of public safety in Fort Lee." Baroni forwarded the email to Wildstein, who sent it to Kelly.
"Did he call him back?" Kelly wrote.
"Radio silence. His name comes right after Mayor Fulop," Wildstein wrote back, a reference to Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop, another municipal official reported to be on the outs with Christie.
"Ty," Kelly responded, the abbreviation for "thank you."
Weinberg has long been a political opponent of Christie — she was former Gov. Jon Corzine's running mate in 2009.
Moreover, in that angry press conference during which he lambasted state Senate Democrats, Christie specifically pointed the finger at state Sen. Raymond Lesniak, a Democrat from Union. Christie said that Lesniak had escalated the situation in the press by threatening to fight over Hoens' appointment.
"Given everything they’ve done before, and the very bold and arrogant announcement by Senator Lesniak, I had to take them at their word," Christie said then. "What the ramifications would be for that going forward, they should have thought about before opening their mouths."
One New Jersey Democrat with experience on multiple campaigns said that the theory was "interesting," but admitted that it didn't explain the personal attacks on Sokolich.
Here's the full Maddow segment (the relevant theory doesn't actually start until around the 11-minute mark):
*****
Jan. 10, 2014, 9:24 AM
MSNBC host Rachel Maddow on Thursday speculated on a new reason the administration of Gov. Chris Christie would want to close lanes onto the George Washington Bridge from Fort Lee.
Her theory is that the Christie administration targeted Sen. Loretta Weinberg (D), the state Senate Democratic leader, for political retribution — not, as has been alleged, the mayor of Fort Lee.
Here's the gist of her theory:
- In 2010, Christie took the unprecedented step of declining to reappoint a sitting justice to the New Jersey Supreme Court. He was the first governor to do so since the current State Constitution was adopted more than 60 years before. State Senate Democrats responded by rejecting every subsequent Christie nominee put forward.
- On Aug. 12, 2013, Christie made another rather stunning move. He decided not to nominate Justice Helen Hoens for a lifetime appointment, despite praising her judicial record. He did this, he said, because Democrats had promised to wage a war over her appointment. In a press conference that day, he reamed into state Senate Democrats, whom he said were preparing to tarnish her good reputation. "I was not going to let her loose to the animals," he said.
- On Aug. 13, 2013, Bridget Anne Kelly, Christie's deputy chief of staff, whom he fired Thursday, sent an email to former Port Authority Director of Interstate Capital Projects David Wildstein, a Christie ally: "Time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee."
- Weinberg, the Senate Democratic leader, represents the New Jersey district that encompasses Fort Lee.
There's no evidence in any of 20-plus pages of documents leaked so far of anything linked to Weinberg. There are four people whose emails and text messages are detailed in the documents — Kelly, Wildstein, Bill Stepien (Christie's former campaign manager), and Bill Baroni (the former deputy executive director of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and Christie's top official at the Port Authority) — and they do not mention her.
Moreover, they often mention Fort Lee Mayor Mark Sokolich, a Democrat who did not endorse Christie for re-election last year — unlike many other Democratic municipal officials. And they refer to him in very negative, personal terms.
Baroni frequently referred to Sokolich as "the Serbian." When an early Wall Street Journal story came out about the lane closures, Stepien called Sokolich an "idiot." Wildstein responded that it was going to be a "tough November for this little Serbian." (Sokolich is actually Croatian, he told CNN.)
And Kelly thanked Wildstein for ignoring Sokolich's complaints about the traffic. On Sept. 9, Sokolich reached out to Baroni's office. Baroni got an email with the subject: "Phone call: Mayor Sokolich ... urgent matter of public safety in Fort Lee." Baroni forwarded the email to Wildstein, who sent it to Kelly.
"Did he call him back?" Kelly wrote.
"Radio silence. His name comes right after Mayor Fulop," Wildstein wrote back, a reference to Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop, another municipal official reported to be on the outs with Christie.
"Ty," Kelly responded, the abbreviation for "thank you."
Weinberg has long been a political opponent of Christie — she was former Gov. Jon Corzine's running mate in 2009.
Moreover, in that angry press conference during which he lambasted state Senate Democrats, Christie specifically pointed the finger at state Sen. Raymond Lesniak, a Democrat from Union. Christie said that Lesniak had escalated the situation in the press by threatening to fight over Hoens' appointment.
"Given everything they’ve done before, and the very bold and arrogant announcement by Senator Lesniak, I had to take them at their word," Christie said then. "What the ramifications would be for that going forward, they should have thought about before opening their mouths."
One New Jersey Democrat with experience on multiple campaigns said that the theory was "interesting," but admitted that it didn't explain the personal attacks on Sokolich.
Here's the full Maddow segment (the relevant theory doesn't actually start until around the 11-minute mark):
*****
Chris Christie "George Washington Bridge documents" collection (9)
posted by peaceblog at
3:16 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home